Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pounce Technologies Inc. V.POI.H

Financial Services
Pounce Technologies Inc has no active business and is currently looking at new business opportunities for a strategic acquisition and a simultaneous financing.


TSXV:POI.H - Post by User

Pounce Technologies Inc. > As They Say ... Hindsight is 20/20
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by NotFreddieon Dec 06, 2016 11:08am
159 Views
Post# 25559924

RE:RE:RE:RE:As They Say ... Hindsight is 20/20

RE:RE:RE:RE:As They Say ... Hindsight is 20/20I agree, Cam's actions should be scrutinized. Let's hope enough folks do, and IIROC does investigate. 

lscfa wrote: good suggestion... report Cam Chell here....     

InvestorInquiries@iiroc.ca     



Leafs4Life wrote: I wouldn't say that nobody will be held accountable. 

If enough people on this board make noises about Cameron Chell's sale of 4 million shares at 2.2 cents the regulators would be compelled to take a look at it. I mean, he could have sold those shares at any time but he happened to sell them right before the company finally capitulated. 

If he knew about the coming sale and acted upon that information without disclosure, he may have broken the law (it was a direct sale so maybe it was fine). It wouldn't be the first time he broke securities law. He was caught forging people's signatures before. 

 




<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities