RE:RE:RE:This may very well be In my experience, you are correct about the danger of random questions in terms of relevance and clarity in the time available.... so it would be well for Vestor and Thor to have all these questions in writing to submit to management, and perhaps be shared aloud after receipt at management's discretion with attendees as questions that will be addressed systematically as a follow up. This could be in detail to the individual inquirer or in an NR if judged to be of material significance.
I am hearing many useful niggling questions, but few that would not potentially confuse and distract rather than add to the collective understanding of others attending. KISS (Keep it simple, "stupid")
fredgoodwinson wrote: Hopefully the Presentations will follow the format of past years where Drs.Lilge and Kulkarni are allowed to give their Presentations largely unhindered followed by a few - hopefully highly relevant - questions taken from the floor.
Questions posed during the course of the Presentation rather then supplementary to it mean that the Presenter`s train of thought can easily be broken and we tend to end up learning less rather than more in the time available if these are little better than interruptions.