RE:Some analysts with negative commentsPierre? Is Zimmee is your dumbed-down "innocent basher" handle?
- Maybe if you use a still larger typeface your desperate attempt
to undermine expert opinion will be even more persuasive, eh?
(more X zero credibility = (hmmm) zero?)
From the Excellent Reuters Analysis link recently posted by Pinotblanc
(by memory but bottom-end numbers accurate if timing not quite)
- the best part comes last
Approx
8 Buy or Outperform Ratings (increasing over time a little)
Approx
16-24 Hold Ratings (at current SP of $1.90+, of course)
Total Negative Predictions;
4 weeks ago:
1 sell,
5 underperform
3 weeks ago:Zero sell,
4 underperform
2 weeks ago:Zero Sell,
3 underperform
1 week ago:Zero Sell,
2 underperform
If this trend continues at this rate,
by Christmas not a single analyst on the planet
will be rating Bombardier even as low as underperform.
(metaphorical references to rockets seems uncannily apprpriate)
IMO, far be it from me to tell you what to do.
Suit yourself if you want to trust 5 month-old opinions
of self-proclaimed expert/bloggers whose self-interest
is soliciting you to pay them to invest your money!
zimmee wrote:
https://www.stockchase.com/company/view/130/Bombardier-Inc--B--referenced-by-David-Cockfield
============================================================================
Bombardier Inc (B) Stock Symbol: BBD.B-T
Last Price Recorded: $1.9000 on 2016-12-07
Globe 5 day average
Google Discussions (view only)
yahoo discussion
Bloomberg
ui-bg_gloss-wave_55_5c9ccc_500x100.png") 50% 50% repeat-x rgb(92, 156, 204); color: rgb(255, 255, 255); border-top-left-radius: 5px; border-top-right-radius: 5px; min-height: 15px; padding: 5px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;">
ui-bg_gloss-wave_55_5c9ccc_500x100.png") 50% 50% repeat-x rgb(92, 156, 204); color: rgb(255, 255, 255); border-bottom-left-radius: 5px; border-bottom-right-radius: 5px; min-height: 15px; padding: 5px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14.6667px;">