RE:RE:RE:SurpriseNo company can hide its financial status without cooking the books illegally, and any basher who references Bombardier from over a year ago as "hiding" their vulnerability (then) as if management lied to shareholders is full of it.
At the time I had not yet invested, and was a true newbie. And I could see that on my first read of the financials.
As for a CS500 I believe nothing until its official, and imagine there are good reasons that might tip the balance for or against any such venture in the near future. The official word is, "not planning to," as it should be... for to shatever extent they continue to consider it, it should come out as a surprize to their competitors, and likely would require a major change in circumstances to make it possible, such as a major partner or institutional investor.
I am not opposed to speculation, but when we try to second guess (let alone coach) management's options, we are out of our league.
Gas claims an inside track.... maybe yes, maybe no.... and how many motivations might he have to post it? There must have been 50 predictors of the Delta deal here, but how could we discern the informed from the speculators?
So I just hold long. News will be welcome. All will be well. Good job, Alain.
gas61di56 wrote: The same source as the Delta order.
Let's be clear, nobody said it was the CS500 but they are hiding something important enough
to sent them back to their hotel room.
In my mind if they were able to hide the fact that the company was close to bankruptcy they can hide
the fact that they have been working on the CS500.
Thst would be quite a Christmas gift if they would come out with such news.