Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by dselon Dec 22, 2016 10:06pm
100 Views
Post# 25638342

To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power

To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Powerhttps://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/21/opinion/to-slow-global-warming-we-need-nuclear-power.html?ribbon-ad-idx=4&rref=opinion&module=Ribbon&version=context&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Opinion&pgtype=article



29390238/NYT/opinion_10__container__" style="border: 0pt none; display: inline-block; width: 1125px; height: auto;">
/www.nytimes.com/newsletters/sample/TY" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);" target="_blank" rel="noindex nofollow">SEE SAMPLE

MANAGE EMAIL PREFERENCES

PRIVACY POLICY

If we want to clean the air and reduce carbon emissions to deal with climate change, we need a stronger, not weaker, 

/topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/atomic-energy/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" style="color: rgb(50, 104, 145);" title="More articles about nuclear energy." rel="noindex nofollow" target="_blank">nuclear energy sector. Congress, federal agencies and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must work with utilities to preserve our existing reactors in the safest possible way, and to develop the next generation of reactors that will provide cheaper, reliable, carbon-free electricity.
Bullboard Posts