RE:RE:RE:Ending 2016 on the bid"If I listened to you in 2016 I would have missed out on 100% gain,"
Joe, you keep on saying that but you never back it up. The reason for that is it was never said. You have held from the beginning which means that even though there was a 100% pump a while back it meant little to you because you are still down over 67%.For those that seen it my way it was simply a profitable flip.
What i was speaking of back then was the fundamental problems of the company which if we are keeping score, still exist and have gotten worse. What I have told you and others multiple times on this board and on other boards is that any stock is a trade at the right moments, but is not a long hold investment until they show that they have a formula for profitability. Now if you had listened to what I (not others) had actually said then you would have traded that last pump, been up and if you so choose, sitting on the sidelines with a profit waiting to see if this had another kick at the can left in it or not. Instead you did not listen and continue to sit on this 2.5 year play hoping that some day you can break even. ($2 - 35c - 83c - 62c
PS- I noticed in your list of great things management told you that the "P" word was nowhere to be found.(Surprise). That is the secret in the world of business, Joe...Seriously...It is that simple no matter what placebo dance management gives you..but are you finally listening? Business is about making a profit, plain and simple.
RE:RE:He is still talking down to you?
"Are you a shareholder, a trader or a vexed employee? i would just like to know the background in which your hatred for this play comes from."
I am a trader of anything tradable but with that said I will not ever consider "Investing" in any shape or form in any person or company that can not speak straight to me. There is a reason why people will not speak straight to you in any circumstance in life, and short of hiding your surprise birthday party, it is never good.
Riverfolk you also stated the following
"Poydras released these revenue and EBITDA numbers early becuase they audited numbers wont be out till end of april."
That is illogical. If you know the unaudited EBITDA, then you also know the unaudited Earnings. In my opinion he continues to not not include that critical piece of information because it would once again show heavy losses which would not allow for a mini-pump in which more savvy players would be able to unload on those that have absolutely no idea of what I am talking about. The sooner some of you realize that the stock market for all practical purposes is a Zero Sum game, which means for every penny gained by one person, a penny has to be lost by someone else, the sooner you will learn what it takes to get on the plus side of that game...and quite frankly allowing yourself to be lead around by the nose ring and accepting veiled, deceptive and incomplete wording and explanations as "good enough" is definitely not part of the road to that destination.