RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pros/ConsIf you call providing facts violent ok lol
I'll hit you with some more facts.
Total Debt/Equity ratio
AU 99.40
GFI 99.40 ABX 86.76
GFI 54.51
KGC 40.01
GCM 39.29
NEM 36.26
AUY 35.42
AEM 27.13
GG 21.96
The debt to equity ratio of GCM may be on the high side but isn't hugely higher than some other gold miners that have debt. The debt looks bigger because the shares and market cap are so low. If the share price was higher, then the market cap would be higher and the debt wouldn't look as big in comparison.
If the gold price hadn't dropped to $1050 their balance sheet would have looked better. Few predicted the long 4 year drop in gold price. But that created the bargain opportunity for new investors now.
Almost all gold miners went from a loss to a profit as well when gold dropped to $1050. Most of them took a big writedown and loss, some of them multiple writedowns during the 4 year gold bear market. The market rewarded the other gold miners for their turnaround. With no analysts covering GCM, the market is slower to recognize GCM's turnaround. Long term that is just fine because they can buy back more debs at a discount.
BuenaSuertaAtod wrote: I think you gentlemen are in (violent) agreement. From what I've seen GCM would have done a great job of ramping up production if it had been done as fast as they planned. It took much longer and burned through too much cash.
Now they are making money hand over fist but they had to leverage up the debt. They should not have let themselves get into trouble. But the future looks bright. They should be contributing to their balance sheet an amount that works out to about a penny per share per month.
-GLTA!