RE:Any Contact?Others have argued, and I agree, that no NR is necessary as the trials proceed, since they have already NR's that they are in process.
The pattern has been not to NR every nuance, and I thnk it is good dicipline for many reasons. Not just trading ethics, but also medical ethics, and in science you don't publish until you have the stat ewvidence to back up yout conclusions.
But since the expectation of three test patients is certain, a poliute request is Roger can share that, via email or phone, might be welcomed and even obliged with an answer. I suggest asking respectfully at what stage inthe prodcfess heanticipotaed releasing an NR, and (with the trend positive), you can graciously let slip that "we'd love to know that all three are enrolled, whenever that happens."
Roger may have replied to me because he was looking for subscribers, but I respect him too much to think that was the only reason. The conversation was substantive and well-managed on his end.
I hope you email him. Good luck. CYD
toade1313 wrote: Does anyone know when RW plans to do a PR? My guess is that once all 3 patients have been approved, that would be a 'material event' that should be disclosed in a PR. I admit this is just speculation on my part. I know some of you have in the past have had email and/or phone contacts with the company and I wonder if this topic had come up? Obviously I know RW couldn't give a specific date, but he could indicate when _____ events have occured he would issue a PR. Thx for any info you have and are authorized to pass on.