RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Yawn! Sorry folks Your DONEYes indeed, Astrium underwriting the technology would imply that it is good, so at the time your reasoning was sound. But you and others have continued to say the this was great technology up until recently! Doesn't a lack of sales after all these years belie this? I have said in the past, and will say it again. As I see it, there are three possibilities for this abject failure:
1. The technology is not what it is cracked up to be.
2. It is good but the company was never able to get it to work.
3. Poor management.
The third reason is likely part of the reason for failure, but I think 1 or 2 (or both) must be in the mix. Don't you think?
Piper