GREY:PGDIF - Post by User
Comment by
ekimon Jan 12, 2017 11:34am
128 Views
Post# 25699394
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WOW
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WOWIt is a tough question.
I think the Securities police are more interested in entities dumping or shorting shares and why and what information are they basing that on.
From PGD's perspective..if you sign a CA or NDA with someone and that someone is happy to go and boost your stock price by buying a million shares on the open market...would that be bad for PGD?
If the CA or NDA agreement is strictly to the point of negotiations and making a deal and doesn't really reveal any insider technical information...then I don't think that cuts any grey area.
If there was some inside technical information...like a desktop or scoping study that can't be released to the public...but before a PEA is available for the public...maybe that goes beyond it.
Releasing the PEA and all the technical data out there..I would suspect Tom would probably say that the public knows what PGD staff know.
Assuming PGD has multiple CA's out there and as long as each party is not privy to the other parties....which should be the way it goes...then that is fine as well.
I think the unethical part would be any verbal/body language cue that an entity can analyze and read between the lines. Very, very grey area.
LONG...PGD
EKIM