Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."


GREY:PGDIF - Post by User

Comment by ekimon Jan 12, 2017 11:34am
128 Views
Post# 25699394

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WOW

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WOWIt is a tough question.

I think the Securities police are more interested in entities dumping or shorting shares and why and what information are they basing that on.

From PGD's perspective..if you sign a CA or NDA with someone and that someone is happy to go and boost your stock price by buying a million shares on the open market...would that be bad for PGD? 

If the CA or NDA agreement is strictly to the point of negotiations and making a deal and doesn't really reveal any insider technical information...then I don't think that cuts any grey area.

If there was some inside technical information...like a desktop or scoping study that can't be released to the public...but before a PEA is available for the public...maybe that goes beyond it.

Releasing the PEA and all the technical data out there..I would suspect Tom would probably say that the public knows what PGD staff know.

Assuming PGD has multiple CA's out there and as long as each party is not privy to the other parties....which should be the way it goes...then that is fine as well.

I think the unethical part would be any verbal/body language cue that an entity can analyze and read between the lines. Very, very grey area. 

LONG...PGD

EKIM
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>