RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Time to get serious about this companyToniv and GV,
Just to clarify, it doesn't matter if 0.4%, 0.6% or even something higher would have been achieved in ASSURE in the RVX-208 treated group if there is no statistically significant difference from the placebo group. The placebo group showed significant regression compared to the baseline placebo measures. The RVX-208-treated group showed significant regression compared to the basline RVX-208 measures. However, when comparing placebo to RVX-208, there was no significant difference between placebo and RVX-208 groups. ASSURE failed not because the RVX-208 group didn't a certain magnitude of regression. ASSURE failed because the trial failed to show any statistically significant benefit above and beyond placebo alone.
You two might have already known this....but I sensed some confusion and just wanted to clear that up just in case.
BearDownAZ