your daily feed. Management must be getting weary that the proposal is not getting great reviews.

So why not put out some more opinions to prove to the Muppets that it is a great deal for all.

Where are the full details from these proxy firms? How have they been compensated for their valued opinions? Is there an conflict of interest that should be disclosed?

If you read the fairness articles in the circular by GMP and  Primary Capital regarding this proposed merger you will find that the vast percent of the opinion of the respective firms is mainly protecting their liability.The opinions are barely a few lines at the end of their reports .
Of course no where does the fairness of the fees involved in this merger ever get mentioned.

As I have stated in other posts , I feel that the new management looks at two entities that are cash and asset rich with no debt where they can make a small investment and then proceed to bleed them dry via fees , expenses and share dilution.
 Please prove me wrong!!! 

Again please prove me to be completely out of my goat brain to think the manner that I am thinking!!

Feel free to read my other posts.

Thanks in advance to all those involved.

Bbzzzz