Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

TS03 Inc Trust Units TSTIF



GREY:TSTIF - Post by User

Comment by eunice12on Jan 22, 2017 5:27pm
178 Views
Post# 25739219

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:No Stock to Borrow

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:No Stock to BorrowYou effectively said it is a one to one ratio that the brokerage is required to maintain when you said every share you move from margin is a share a shorter has to cover. When I talked to my discounter I thought he said it was a different ratio than one to one?
Also I thought once the brokerage overall breached the shorts to marginable ratio that every short was required to close their contract by buying by the end of that day. If so, then as long as the total shorts with that brokerage stayed within the ratio, it doesn't have an effect when small amounts are moved from margin to cash account. However once the ratio is breached, the brokerage invoked a full scale short covering. That is how it went the time I shorted AirCanada, one massive short covering for the entire brokerage, although anyone could short back the next day. Correct?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>