GREY:PGDIF - Post by User
Comment by
ekimon Feb 03, 2017 3:07pm
106 Views
Post# 25796930
RE:alberto, northmark, ntagain, et al
RE:alberto, northmark, ntagain, et alSilvewhere.
Critics haven't added anything substantial to the DD since at least when the PEA came out.
For a couple of years they did sugest/warn/imply that the Chidliak pipes are too small to amount to anything of economic value.
For about 6 to 12 months there was a strong suggestion that capital costs would be at least $1 billion for a northern project like Chidliak.
Both of those were at least something to consider and question with one owns research.
With the advent of the PEA...those are pretty much out the window..they had their time and have now expired and not much mention of either arguments since then.
Since then, there have been no further DD towards Chidliak.
I think that pretty much sums up the two strongest arguments,...that same might consider DD or a consideration of DD in the last few years on this thread.
I'm all for getting all fatal flaws out in the air.
LONG...PGD
EKIM