Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc V.BKM

Alternate Symbol(s):  PBMLF

Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. is a Canadian natural resource exploration company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of its mineral property interests, with its principal mineral property interests located in Canada. The Company is in the advanced stage of exploration of the Morrison deposit, a porphyry copper/gold/molybdenum ore body, located approximately 35 kilometers (km) north of Granisle, BC and situated within the Babine Lake Porphyry Copper Belt. It has a 100% interest in certain mineral claims located contiguous to the Morrison claims. The Company is proposing an open-pit mining and milling operation for the production of copper/gold/silver concentrate and molybdenum concentrate. It is located within 29 km of two former producing copper mines, Bell and Granisle. The Company is in the design stage of the exploration and evaluation of the Morrison property.


TSXV:BKM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by ChristyClarkon Feb 21, 2017 4:11pm
257 Views
Post# 25873636

Lawsuit?

Lawsuit?So the plan is (for the priviliged few that call into Elmer Fudd daily) to piggyback off the Taseko court case and then voila, sue for damages?

Let me remind you that the EAC is the FIRST STEP.  Once granted an EAC, then you enter the mines permitting phase and mines permiting act. I believe you need roughly 10 mining permits before you start extracting ore.

Elmer Fudd spouting off that we are entitled to damages is so effing distorted that anyone believing that deserves to lose all of their capital. No chance in hell the courts would award damages for a company that doesnt even have an EAC.
Bullboard Posts