Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

District Copper Corp V.DCOP

Alternate Symbol(s):  CAXPF

District Copper Corp. is a Canadian company engaged in the exploration for porphyry copper deposits in south-central British Columbia. The Company’s Copper Keg project covers approximately 3,272 hectares (ha), located on the northern end of the prolific Guichon Creek batholith, Highland Valley mining complex, British Columbia.


TSXV:DCOP - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Sophia123on Feb 27, 2017 2:23pm
144 Views
Post# 25900238

RE:$131 k in CASH????

RE:$131 k in CASH????
On June 14, 2016 Carmax received notice that 7 parties had filed a Petition in the Supreme Court of British Columbia against the Chief Gold Commissioner (the “CGC”) requesting a judicial review of his decision to reinstate Carmax’s claim #1034634. The Petitioners’ request for a judicial review is based on two grounds, the first of which relates to the manner in which the CGC interpreted his authority under s. 67 of the Mineral Tenure Act and the factors he considered relevant in exercising his discretion. The second ground is a challenge of the procedures employed by the CGC in making his determination.

Subsequent to Year End:
 The judicial review was heard in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on January 24, 2017. Carmax was not a party to these proceedings and until the decision from the Supreme Court is delivered, Carmax’s title to claim #1034634 is in doubt.
Bullboard Posts