OTCPK:RKNLF - Post by User
Comment by
factRbeston Mar 01, 2017 3:28pm
149 Views
Post# 25914412
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Actually
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Actually MatWei - (3/1/2017 2:45:56 PM) RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Actually When I referred to ESW not being able to vote on change of control transactions, I was probably using them in a general sense. I'm very sure (though would have to read it again) that the investor / owner cannot vote on change of control. Splitting hairs is indeed what lawyers do, but if the commercial principle here is valid and clearly understood, my own working experience is that the language is tight around it, and that furthermore, if taken to dispute, courts will side with the commercial principle.
==========================================
Well I watched and warned of such an example.
Mining company in Quebec - name slips me (chinese involvment)
The larger partnered company immediately after coming on board issued a board load of shares and diluted the previous owners into almost nothing.
Immediately went to court and the junior settled on a takeover as they had no money.
So who fights ESW if they do anything questionable.
As I have said many times, there are too many uncertainties here.
Every questions brings two more.