Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seven Aces Limited - Ordinary Shares ACEXF

Seven Aces Ltd is a gaming company with a vision of building a diversified portfolio of gaming operations. The corporation looks to enhance shareholder value by growing organically and through acquisitions. Currently, the corporation is the route operator of skill-based gaming machines in the State of Georgia, United States of America.


GREY:ACEXF - Post by User

Comment by lscfaon Mar 20, 2017 11:01am
134 Views
Post# 26001928

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Any Thoughts?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Any Thoughts?How f'ing stupid are you?....lucky had no taxes and no interest expense but QIC does....ebitda multiples are higher than p/e multiples because eps numbers are after taxes and interest expense...analysts compare co.s on ebitda multiples to factor out differences in leverage between co.s....I gave 2 alternative valuations of QIC with lucky and the 2 newest acquisitions, one using a ebitda multiple of 8 and a p/e multiple of 15.....15 p/e is a broad market multiple, you frigging dumbass



I gave you 2 alternative
Wonderwon wrote: It is a lot easier to make investing decisions when you do your own analysis instead of relying on some unverified report from Cantor.  I have cited two examples of arm's length transactions (Anil/Quantum, and Innova/Pollard) where the actual multiples are much lower than what you and Cantor cited.  By the way, still looking for the 15x multiple that began this topic.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>