GREY:ACEXF - Post by User
Comment by
lscfaon Mar 20, 2017 11:01am
134 Views
Post# 26001928
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Any Thoughts?
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Any Thoughts?How f'ing stupid are you?....lucky had no taxes and no interest expense but QIC does....ebitda multiples are higher than p/e multiples because eps numbers are after taxes and interest expense...analysts compare co.s on ebitda multiples to factor out differences in leverage between co.s....I gave 2 alternative valuations of QIC with lucky and the 2 newest acquisitions, one using a ebitda multiple of 8 and a p/e multiple of 15.....15 p/e is a broad market multiple, you frigging dumbass
I gave you 2 alternative
Wonderwon wrote: It is a lot easier to make investing decisions when you do your own analysis instead of relying on some unverified report from Cantor. I have cited two examples of arm's length transactions (Anil/Quantum, and Innova/Pollard) where the actual multiples are much lower than what you and Cantor cited. By the way, still looking for the 15x multiple that began this topic.