Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pilbara Minerals Ord Shs T.PLS


Primary Symbol: PILBF

Pilbara Minerals Limited is an Australia-based lithium company. The Company is primarily engaged in the exploration, development, and mining of minerals in Australia. Its 100% owned Pilgangoora hard-rock lithium operation is located approximately 120 kilometers (kms) from Port Hedland in Western Australia’s resource-rich Pilbara region. The operation consists of two processing plants: the Pilgan Plant, located on the northern side of the Pilgangoora area and produces spodumene and tantalite concentrates, and the Ngungaju Plant is located to the south produces spodumene concentrate. It owns 70% of the Mt Francisco project, which is located 50 km south-west of the Pilgangoora Project and hosts the large occurrence of outcropping pegmatites located nearby to Port Hedland. It is also pursuing a proposed downstream joint venture (JV) for the development of an approximately 43,000 tons per annum (tpa) lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) lithium chemical conversion facility in South Korea.


OTCPK:PILBF - Post by User

Comment by seatleslimon Mar 25, 2017 10:28am
170 Views
Post# 26030167

RE:Polaris needs Cemex but can't make any money from them

RE:Polaris needs Cemex but can't make any money from themThat is a great point with which to challenge PLS Board and management. If that is correct, it would seem that PLS has not much future as an independent company.  I'm hoping (and beilieve) that the answer and reality is more nuanced.  More like, CX desperately needs PLS for high spec work and work in immediate proximity to their facilities in SFO and Redwood City, around which there is massive ready-mix infrastructure in place.  They may at some point deperately need the resource more generally if work picks up or if there is a supply issue at one or more of the local incumbent quarries.  If PLS can't show that the volume reductions were replaced with much higher margin in the form of price increases, then it doesn't make much sense to run a public company to move a bunch of sand around the seas with little compensation to the owners.

The interesting thing in that more pessimistic view is that there are several logical companies that ought to be eager to own this.  Vulcan, Hanson, Summit (which bought out a major Vancouver operation in one of its formative transactions) and of course CEMEX.  An outlier might be US concrete.  It has to be worth twice or more what its selling for to one of those.  But I honestly hope that is the default worst-case.  If anything, you would think CEMEX would be vunerable to a deep-pocketed owners, as I don't think there is any question about long-term supply issues in the Bay area.  Vulcan is a $15 billion company and could shut down Orca for two years without any material consequence if CEMEX wanted to horse around with its "supply agreement".  If I were CEMEX I would want PLS profitable enough to stay independent.  At the end of the day everybody in the Bay area market is going to recover any price increases anyway.

There are several other wild cards beyond the Olympics.  A seismic event and one or more of the BC LNG projects come to mine.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>