RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Question for the legal minds re right to dissent A lot of noise about the current shareholders being bumped down the priority list for company assets (and rightfully so). But on the flipside, can someone explain to me why anyone would want to invest a large amount of $$ into a company and have no say (voting rights) in how it is run? Seems like the group of shareholders with the smallest claim will be controlling the direction of the company for the other group of shareholders with the biggest claim. Kinda messed up, no? TW