GREY:BLITF - Post by User
Post by
BadMedicineon Apr 02, 2017 11:57am
37 Views
Post# 26064746
Devils advocate AllAboard
Devils advocate AllAboardPutting aside for the moment, the clear shakedown attempt of Fairmont and its executives, the entire scope of the discrepencies the courts found in documents has not been discussed here other than getting the corrupt Javier's charges on the whole thing.
The issue with the notary stamp, if it is factual, this needs clearing up and without a doubt, the company has submitted the chain of documents evidence that explains what took place.
(A) A legal document
(B) Signatory for the company is Michael Dehn
(C) Notarized (this is where the suggested discrepancy arises)
AllAboard, if we are to take this charge at face value, what are the potential explanations for the discrepency?