RE:Pati3nc3 and lessons learntThe problem with your dumd dumb advice is you will only make money based on somebody else losing money. On the the other hand if this was a new situation you could be right but the its not new. The stupid money already piled in. I believe the better way to interpret this situation is how did INT with no assets run all the way to $3.35 and yet AAO only made it to a dime. The Ceo sees greener pastures and I think thats why MOO makes sense. The concept stock theory has run its course and now real assets may be needed for a run to a quarter. AS for the whole Mexmillions and Seargeant Brown and Pattinic thing I hope its all over. You dont need real assets to back up an asking price just stupid buyers. So what if a one bedroom condo in Toronto goes for 4 million. Its not a criminal matter