RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Just a question....?This will be my last post on this board. I started posting because I did not want to see people lose all their money. I'll end with the following: In civil discovery years ago I was asked a number of questions about my Stockhouse posts. I was the victim of a fraud and I won the lawsuit. Here is my main point... 1.how do we know that the people in this case are not just middle aged people frustrated and decide to take a big risk and essentially lie to shareholders. 2.How do we know that the Panasonic connection is not simply a friend of a friend, so to speak. 3. If everything is not true then a criminal offence has occurred. If some of it is true then the ASC is well equipped to handle it. 4. The silence is deafening in this case. Personally I do not believe anything the company has stated is true. Good luck to all-for shareholders I hope you make money...shorters I am certain you will make money. Brian