RE:RE:RE:RE:level 2sah1 wrote: That's fine. 2bmb. But I still believe a hostile takeover is a possibility, especially as we know Roche must be taking a very close look at PLI as we speak.
And why do we know this?? Zero evidence at all that Roche even cares. I also don't buy the "hostile takeover" theory because if any of these companies wanted to assert control over accumulating PLI stock, they could have bought hundreds of millions of shares the past 6 months without making impact on the shareprice... I guess yes, at 10% they would have to declare their stake, but so what?