Alexandria Minerals Corp ALXDF

RE:RE:RE:News on hole 91 has to be forthcoming any day....

[goldhunter11]

stateside,
Thanks. You saved my day.

I saw that drill hole trace now (dotted) with the hole number tugged away at the end of the hole. It seems to share the same drill collar with drill hole OAX-17-090 (on surface). This diagram is in the S-N x-section (Orenda Zone 4), but in the typical AZX fashion, the S-N was not labelled. So Hole OAX-17-091 was angled toward the N (at about 20 deg from the vertical ) compared to hole 90 which is steeper (@ about 10 deg from the vertical).

By the way, do you know what kind of rock the yellow and pink zones represent? AZX did not bother to educated non-geo people. I know the purple stuff is the ultramafic rock (and Au barren?). The Pink stuff is also barren? So we should only count on the yellow zone for Au mineralization? At least, that what I am assuming when I do a back of the napkin calculation.

Production 5 (2 April 2017 post) shows another x-section (for thw W-E direcction, at least this diagram gives some hint about the East (tiny print at the top right corner). Hole 90 was shown, along with 92, 94, 97 were shown. But, hole 91 was not shown. What so difficult about adding another label for hole 91 with an arrow  pointing to the same drill collar (for 90) on the surface? This is a sloppy presentation which make an independent check by investors more difficult.

Not sure if Owens and his staff realize investors'  frustration and would be receptive for suggestions for  improvements.

In this modern age, hoarding of information does not help crowd sourcing. The company should take advantage of this free advertisement from its own investors by releasing more complete information and keep them all in one place for easy reference and ready access.
GH