OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User
Comment by
hammer161on Apr 12, 2017 12:22pm
201 Views
Post# 26112966
RE:RE:Way too much unnecessary promotion here
RE:RE:Way too much unnecessary promotion here
373 g/t over 0.65 metres is indeed an impressive value, but what BGM has done is smear this out over 20 metres with one other result of 40 g/t over 0.7 metres - there is a gap of 13.7 metres between the two samples. the two samples between them account for 270.45 gram metres out of a total of 282 gram metres in the entire interval, or 96.65 of the gold in the entir einterval. The other 18.65 mertes averages 0.62 g/t. Is this reasonable reporting? If you take the time to look at the detailed results they do this sort of thing consistently. It can give the wrong inpression and certainly may not be what they mine.