OTCPK:SPLID - Post by User
Comment by
Bobthebuilddron Apr 12, 2017 3:44pm
139 Views
Post# 26114424
RE:silly questions
RE:silly questionsDo you even understand the LAK deal? It's either set up 2 ways. EAT has bought the building for 2.4mil or they are going to split cost. Since LAK just raised cash themselves. 2.4 million all from EAT will EAT away half there cash flow. And might as well make it a even 3 million once renovations are done. Doing it together with LAK increases the revenue. So they get more per month back, while setting up for oils and edibles in the same building. Im sure there is a trim discount deal in there somewhere also so we can get trim for oil by walking across the hallway. Do you even own a single share geo? I don't think you do. You have such narrow vision. Think bigger for once in you're life. Revenue from 10 different sources is better then 1 source. Or 1 state. Wake up
geodcan wrote: just read the latest nr and it raises a question of `why do we need LAK? Have they done their change of business and how long will that take? Have we run our course on raising money under our own monicker? Possibly! Working LAK into the equation will just delay things and create an opportunity for Posner and friends to double dip by the granting of shares and options and warrants for a new company to do what Nutritional High is/should be doing. These guys are like Scrooge McDuck hiding in their money pits and we still can't buy a product in Colorado! It seems that we are copying what happened in Colorado which is opportunity to slop at the trough while accomplishing very little by way of adding to the bottom line and taking care of shareholders! This is more wool being pulled over our eyes while they are raising and wasting investors dollars on frivolous moves. glta and dyodd