RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:CEO.ca@pbay - you are so busted! Good find dart.!Hey Cory, both scenarios are valid and they are not stories and I see you won't quit either. Earlier bashers complained APL was making all the money and CNZ was getting the short end with $9 per ton plus commission. Which one is it? Looks to me its a win-win for CNZ. Call the company if you are truly concerned. quote=CoreyB]But the pumpers have been saying over and over and over that CNZ has ZERO costs other than office expenses, now they share in half the mining costs? Which storyline are you going to run with?
depths wrote: Another feeble attempt to bash. Yes, you pretend to understand nothing and you have been exposed and yet you just won't quit. Are you getting over time for the weekend? A 50/50 partnership means CCNZ splits the cost and the profits for all activities. Earlier bashers were complaining that APL was making all the money and they deservedly make more than CNZ but as a 50/ 50 partnership CNZ will be splitting costs and profits and the balance will be in CNZ's favor over the present 9$ ton plus commission. Again, nice try.
thepbay wrote: A 50-50 partnership on the claim, really means nothing, because CNZ needs tranportation, mill, processing, packaging and shipping. CNZ is nothing! They would also have to pay for blasting, ect. There is so much more to this story that hasn't been told, it unbelievable. Another Dart winner!!!!! But wait, there are NRs coming that are going to make this a 4 dollar stock. Ya, based on history, we believe you! GL
pbay
depths wrote:
Hey pbay, in your desperate attempt to scare up shares you chose to ignore the 43-101 on CNZ's website https://canadianzeolite.com/operations/bromley-creek/ Again, nice try. By the way (and you already know this) when the $725k is paid to CNZ they become 50/50 partners and CNZ's total profits go up. Again, nice try.
[/quote]