RE:RE:Time for a reality check folks I feel the same way about this board. That being said everyone does have their agenda, for
Most it's simply to make money. the main neigh Sayers have been around since then beggining. The main points that I put any weight behind is future dilution with potential merger and funding in the future. I feel it Is too soon to get an accurate scope as what that situation entails. No omen lnows what the future will bring from now till then. If there were serious negatives with what he company hasn't done, who is involved and what they are projecting it wouldn't be aired here non stop discrediting everything brought forward in a positive light. I was a attendee at the unveiling and that solidified all the DD I did to that date. Every start up in venture comes with its risk but other than what has been said here, speculation on this board I have yet to here credible claims that refute the companies claims. I feel nothing hasn't changed from company. They have done what they have said, solid team involved and projected what's planned for future. The sp is the true negative at the moment and I have my own opinion from a technical stand point. In the end the DD I have preformed and what was experienced at the unveiling leaves me trusting who is involved and the technological feat they're standing behind. The negative claims that have been presented have not been enough to outweigh potential in my eyes.
As for the releases that cover half the story of a new company. It's clear they were not reporting from a biased stand point as a large amount of pertinent information was neglected to Be covered. These were the main sources of eddy in the beginning.