Big Is Never Big Enough! The biggest, best, massive tax cut plan in all human history was not enough to shake the petroleum sector out of its bearish slumber. The petroleum sector has been dripping down slowly like a good old fashion water torture as the market is fixated on short term supplies and not our future. While the market continues to believe that shale oil is going to plug the gap in the global oil market, it will at some point find out that shale oil is a band aide on what is becoming a gaping wound.
Just yesterday the International Energy Agency (IEA) reported that global oil discoveries fell to a record low in 2016 as companies continued to cut spending. The IEA said that sanctioned conventional oil projects are at the lowest level in more than 70 years and warned that both trends could continue this year. “Every new piece of evidence points to a two-speed oil market, with new activity at a historic low on the conventional side contrasted by remarkable growth in US shale production,” said Dr Fatih Birol, the IEA’s executive director. “The key question for the future of the oil market is for how long can a surge in US shale supplies make up for the slow pace of growth elsewhere in the oil sector.”
That is the question that I pose. I fear that an over reliance on shale oil for future demand growth is putting the global economy at risk. The short lifetime of a shale well and the fact that big oil companies are going to shale not because they necessarily believe that is the answer to meet demand growth, but where these companies with mounting losses can make a quick buck to offset major losses over the past oil projects. But if you look at the math, the lack of investment in conventional oil projects is adding up to the loss of billions of barrels.
According the IEA data, oil discoveries declined to 2.4 billion barrels in 2016, compared with an average of 9 billion barrels per year over the past 15 years. That is a loss of potential future supply of about 6.6 billion barrels. How long will it take shale producers to increase footer output to replace 6.6 billion barrels of oil?
Just the volume of conventional resources sanctioned for development last year fell to 4.7 billion barrels, 30% lower than the previous year, as the number of projects that received a final investment decision dropped to the lowest level since the 1940s according to IEA data. The IEA says that the sharp slowdown in activity in the conventional oil sector was the result of reduced investment spending driven by low oil prices. It brings an additional cause for concern for the global energy security at a time of heightened geo-political risks in some major producer countries such as Venezuela.
The slump in the conventional oil sector contrasts with the resilience of the U.S. shale industry. There the investment rebounded sharply and output rose on the back of production costs being reduced by 50% since 2014. This growth in U.S. shale production has become a fundamental factor in balancing low activity in the conventional oil industry. The loss of conventional oil supply is a growing problem. The IEA says that conventional oil production of 69 mb/d represents by far the largest share of global oil output of 85 mb/d. With global demand expected to grow by 1.2 mb/d a year in the next five years, the IEA has repeatedly warned that an extended period of sharply lower oil investment could lead to a tightening in supplies.
That is out of sight out of mind as we are being blinded by the flash in shale oil production. It is not that I am saying that shale oil production is insignificant because I am not. I am talking about the potential for shale to change the global energy space before most people even knew what I was talking about. Yet my concern is that an over reliance on shale oil is going to lead us to a short oil market in the future and that may develop faster than we think. That is a growing risk to the economy as the market seems immune to the growing upside risks. Remember, it is not high oil prices that hurt an economy, it is spiking energy prices that hit us out of the blue that causes price shock even if we should have seen it coming.
Oil products like gasoline and ultra low sulfur diesel had a drag on the market after the Energy Information Administration reported a build in products even as oil supply fell. The EIA reported that crude oil inventories fell by 3.64 million barrels but gasoline inventories rose by 3.37 million barrels and distillates increased by 2.65 million barrels as refiners ramped up and took no prisoners.
Oil and gold did not like Trump’s tax plan. The main points of having only three tax brackets,10%, 25% and 35%, doubling the standard deduction, repeal of the Alternative Minimum Tax, did not excite oil and gold. Cutting capital gains and the corporate tax rate and keeping deductions only for mortgages and charities failed to wow the market. When you build things up, sometimes you get disappointed.
MarketWatch reported that changes to the U.S. tax rate have implications for gold (and oil) because a reduction could fuel further gains in assets perceived as risky, like stocks, and possibly shrink appetite for havens. The proposal also includes an incentive to repatriate accumulated foreign profits for U.S. companies, which could prove dollar-positive, hurting demand for gold (and oil).
Of course for oil, that may change because such a big cut in taxes would boost demand due to growth and unmask what could be a potential future shortage.
Natural gas tracks center stage today as the growing structural shortage in this market is starting to be recognized. We saw natural gas, unlike oil, put in a strong performance yesterday ahead of today’s supply report. According to a Reuters poll, they are expecting an injection of 72 billion cubic feet (bcf) of natural gas into storage. They say that warmer-than-normal weather curbed heating demand. The forecast compares with builds of 54 bcf in the prior week, 64 bcf in the same week last year and a five-year average build for the week of 57 bcf. I am looking for a 67 bcf injection that if we see, could break us up over resistance.
Thanks,
Phil Flynn
Questions? Ask Phil Flynn today at 312-264-4364
https://blog.pricegroup.com/2017/04/27/big-is-never-big-enough-the-energy-report-042717/