RE:Who are the con artists?naimarantz wrote:
It doesnt make any logical sense that two supportive individuals who have been here since .10 (and are still here after the run to 1.95) are being labeled con artists. Seriously, if they were shysters they would have cut and run at over a dollar and moved off to scam another stock as shysters do. But they are still here, believe in the stock and continue to provide supportive evidence to reasonable posters. What stands out loud and clear are the small group of posters who suddenly appeared after the dramatic price drop and continuously post excessive and disparaging comments against anything that resembles the slightest support for the company. Now why would they do that? As we have witnessed in the past these con artist do disappear once the price takes off. It can't come soon enough for me.
naimarantz, for you to think the two biggest con artists (Sly & dart) are the supportive ones shows how gullible you are.