RE:RE:RE:nicejjeerryy wrote: dart321 wrote: I wouldn't be concerned what those liers say. What is important is what the company releases as we watch them develop ( the AGM was fantastic ). I like the post jjeerryy said awhile back that I seen when I was logged off. It said we all should read p-pumps posts because he was posting the truth, LOL that was funny. What is it now, I think he has been caught in at least four lies. Most people here have met a number of us face to face. I think that is important, know and meet those that talk to you. Those that hide behind a key board and sling chit are not trustworthy and should be ignored. It's nice because you only see a clean respectable conversation.
You dart321 are the LIAR, not us. You said the same about me over at Vanc (V.VANC Previously V.NPH) when I was warning people there were too many red flags and you were spouting a lot of hype exaggeration and bs. You claimed the Q4 financials were going to be great. When they were released they showed nothing then you claimed the Year End report was going to show us everything and again that was a flop.
I recall how people were cussing you then and I am going to see it happen again when CNZ shows nothing in their financials.
You dart321 along with SlyinCalgary are LIARS and con artists.
Time is on my side, the financials will prove me correct and some in here will be lining up to cuss you out once again!
Hey jjeerryy, you really have to get over your NPH obsession. Just because NPH's management screwed up years ago does not somehow mean CNZ's is screwing up tody. Where do you come up with this stuff??? How could you ever know what CNZ's upcoming financials are going to say? And you call dart a con? If you have any proof that CNZ is fundamentally similar to NPH then bring it on. You couldn't look like a much bigger fool so what have you got to lose?