RE:RE:Investors need to understand somethingstocknews101 wrote: Isaiah83 wrote: I stated this probably 4+ months ago now and it has been reiterated time after time. Purity levels at lab scale are not the determining factor for the SP to skyrocket. Im sure they've achieved 5n maybe even 6n at lab scale. But ask yourself this: is proving something at lab scale the same as proving it at full plant production scale? No it's not. We know the science works, but things get complicated when you try and scale it to production levels. This is why Bernard and co. are not rushing out to pump 5n or even 6n news. Simply put that won't make a damn difference if this technology cannot be scaled. Now I do agree that Bernard could have avoided that by properly stating that scalability is the main determining factor a long time ago, but instead "purity purity purity" was the factor that was being pushed. Everyone's focus here should shift to the scalabity side of things. Even if we don't hit solar grade, if 4n scalability is acheived we'll still be laughing (just not as much). Cheers
but he didn't mind pumping 5N when he needed money.
That's probably very true.
He should have said "we are attempting to reach 5N but it's not likely we will get there, but we can only find out by trying a few experiments which share holders will have to pay for (we have no other source of money to pay for this work except by people who are willing to share in the potential profit of success).