OTCPK:EUCTF - Post by User
Comment by
kidl2on Jun 01, 2017 10:40am
61 Views
Post# 26310879
RE:RE:RE:RE:little order from SICPA
RE:RE:RE:RE:little order from SICPAfrs: There are essentially 2 parts to the royalty agreement.
Part 1 is a minimum $1.5 Mil annual guarantee which SICPA has to pay for 6 years. This is payable even if any or all of the contracts which existed at the time the deal was signed were to be cancelled.
Part 2 deals with NEW contracts. It calls for a 5% royalty for the 6, respectively 9 year contract period. This 5% royalty is payable IN ADDITION to the guaranteed annual minimum of $1.5 Mil.
And this is where Tanzania comes into play ... By classifying the recently signed 3 year deal as a renewal, it falls into part 1 which means NO additional royalty payments to EUO. Had it been classified as a NEW contract, SICPA would have had to pay a 5% royalty in addition to the guaranteed minimum over the 3 year contract period.
That’s an estimated $2.3 Mil in “lost” revenue to EUO. Since royalty revenue falls directly to the bottom line (no associated costs to speak of), this foregone revenue would have gone a long way towards eliminating EUO’s ongoing operating losses.