Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Iplayco Corp Ltd IPPQF

Iplayco Corp Ltd designs, manufactures, and installs indoor and outdoor play structures for children. It operates in two business segments: Manufacturing of play structures for children from its facilities in Langley, British Columbia, Canada, and Subic Bay, Philippines; and Operating a family entertainment center in Langley, British Columbia, Canada. It offers play products, such as indoor play, air trek, ballistics play, toddler play, theming, outdoor play, outdoor installs, indoor installs, p


GREY:IPPQF - Post by User

Comment by mcv1on Jun 12, 2017 5:53pm
116 Views
Post# 26354362

RE:Going Private ?

RE:Going Private ?
Not so much.

If Saudi FAS Holding Company had any interest in taking IPC private they would have taken the former CEO's shares which were sold at 50 cents instead of paying double now.

If you look at the financials they have been using Iplayco as their piggy bank to finance their playground structures. You can see this through the related party transactions. They would no longer be able to do this if they went private.

The parent company Alhokair likes to leverage so putting out $10 million for a company they already control makes no sense.

The company is greatly undervalued and tightly held. Even if they tried to do this they need a super-majority of shareholder support and there is a large number of shareholders who would block such a deal.

The costs of being public on the Venture exchange are less than 1% of sales which is relatively insignificant.

When a shareholder has a bare majority of 51% it is all about control. If they wanted a larger % they would have acquired it in the first place.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>