RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:This board deterioted pretty quickSorry 23F35, I had written this earlier but hadn't fully finished so it didn't get posted.
LMAO piker, can hear that? It's the black helicopters flying overhead. Oh my gosh you have a paranode imagination. You forgot to include that I'm also tibutch.
"I admit we are financially behind on FLYHT, with less flying hours, but in the end the better product will win."
This is such an understatement. FLY has been making money for the last 4 quarters, it took years to get there and 1000 units installed. SNA doesn't have any measurable flight hours. As far as superior product goes you startroopers have been claiming that for years. Based on what I'm not sure other than maybe what you've been told by BL and management. Beta claimed to be better than VHS at the time and we all know how well that worked out for them and eventually both versions. Wake up piker.
When have I ever said not to own SNA? I've always said there's room in the market for other players. If SNA ever demonstrates they have a working business plan I'll but shares. Fluff isn't a business plan in my books. My point has been for the likes of you to get your head out of your a s s, ask questions, hold management accountable and know what you're invested in and be realistic with your expectations. Reading the nonsense getting posted here screams that none of you have a clue of what you've bought into. I honestly don't give a f k piker what you think of me. Just know that you're wrong on every single point of your post, absolutely everything. Good luck with your investment.