EvelKnievel wrote: What I'm wondering is if people could put out some legitimate facts as to why deals such as the kind we are expecting GLH to still close, may close much later than stated? I'm wondering if people could use factual examples using any decent respectable successful companies out there who have had similar circumstances like GLH's occur where although they stated that deals were supposed to close sooner, that they still successfully closed much later down the road regardless anyways.
Not that this discussion will make a difference in GLH's stock price, or speed up GLH's actions any faster, but I was just trying to look for some healthy balanced discussion,using facts to help get a better understanding of why GLH even though they may know without a doubt all their 4 deals are signed, sealed and done, why they still would delay the news. My own main theory was simply it takes time to fully put all the legal paperwork into action, to officially close them, despite the fact the deals are all closed on more initial levels, just like how although weed will be recreationally legal in Canada ultimately, how it still takes a certain amount of time involving paperwork and legalities to make it as official as possible. I mean, for example, they said weed would be recreationally legal this past spring, but now they say it may take as long as 2019 for it to be truly official, because of all the legislation, etc...required. We do keep hearing Canada July 1st 2018 keep in mind always though. Keep in mind what the world tends to keep in its own collective mind.
I truly try to avoid speculation, however in this case I was simply looking for real facts, using examples of cases which supporrt why the delay with GLH. It's way too easy to bash why GLH is delaying. It's way too easy to use bs non factual fearmongering nonsense to bash GLH. I'm looking for support using real historical factual examples of other extremely successful companies..
Regardless of anything said here, I myself will hold onto my GLH shares until I at least make a profit. I refuse to sell for a loss. I have 13 years at least to hold my GLH shares to do this. If I don't manage to do this, within this alloted time, then so be it, that's how it is... That's my plan and I'm sticking to it...
Ideally, if I could keep selling for a profit on highs, and rebuy my shares with that entire amount at lows, then this is what I'd do. I basically would try to increase my amount of GLH shares, while only putting in my initial prinicipal investment once. That's being ideal though.
I always have the option to add more principal cash for whatever reasons at whatever time, however the one constant that would always remain is simply to not sell for a loss, ever. My definition of a loss mind you is NOT where I sell for less than what I initially paid of course. My definition of selling for a loss is instead based off of selling my shares for less than my average cost per share.
Technically, if I played my cards right, I could get my average cost per share down to a negative number, where the only way I could technically take a loss in selling is if the company went bankrupt... I'm taking a calculated risk with GLH based on my endless DD on them. I figure I'd rather place my caculated DD infused risk bet on GLH, and multiple other diversified stocks, rather than to spend it all instead using blind risk bets in the casinos.
Anyways... That's about all I got to say on Stockhouse for now... I'll go back to my normal routine now of simply posting news, info and articles I find out there on the internet that is related to stocks I am in.
That's alll...
Have a good weekend...