Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canopy Growth Corp T.WEED

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.WEED.DB | CGC

Canopy Growth Corporation is a cannabis company. It delivers innovative products with a focus on premium and mainstream cannabis brands, including Doja, 7ACRES, Tweed, and Deep Space, in addition to category-defining vaporizer technology made in Germany by Storz & Bickel. The principal activities of the Company are the production, distribution and sale of a diverse range of cannabis and cannabinoid-based products for both adult-use and medical purposes under a portfolio of distinct brands in Canada. Its Canada cannabis segment includes the production, distribution, and sale of a range of cannabis, hemp, and cannabis related products in Canada. International markets cannabis segment includes the production, distribution, and sale of a range of cannabis and hemp products internationally. Storz & Bickel segment includes the production, distribution, and sale of vaporizers. This Works segment includes the production, distribution and sale of beauty, skincare, wellness and sleep products.


TSX:WEED - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by SquishyIncon Aug 04, 2017 6:57pm
135 Views
Post# 26550029

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Aphria video BNN

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Aphria video BNNHey, Timmo Von McCrackonov,

You've given us noobs some good schooling on the nitty gritty of dilution, i'm just curious what you think about a somewhat newly formed company starting with a relatively large number of shares out in the very beginning. I was checking out HIP.v (Newstrike) out of sheer curiousity, and they have over 300 million shares out already and they're just getting started. Would you consider dilution to be more of a relative thing, where initial shares out doesn't matter as much as how much it's diluted from that point forward? Or would you consider that float to be a considerable hindrance to that company moving forward? I'm just thinking, a company with it's SP in the neighbourhood of 40 cents is going to have to dilute that much more than it already has to raise any sort of meaningful capital. Seems like a recipe for disaster, to me. Anyhoo, would appreciate yer thoughts or anybody who has anything meaningful to say to that.



TimMcCracken wrote:
Grnhousegarbage wrote:
Vic is a horrible leader. He should be more focused on the quality of his product then subliminal insults at his competitors. Low cog's low cog's low cog's.... low quality. Higher quality bud can demand a higher price and potentially deliver higher margins. He him self said he can not grow the same quality as indoor.... does that mean there is no place for greenhouse? Not there is but don't get all butt hurt because investors value multiple growing platforms. F Vic he's a cry baby. I'd like aph much better if he was replaced with someone focused more on aph instead of it's competitors



Vic has still not formally announced or addressed the options he issued himself and staff the day before they released earnings. 

He is stealing from longs future pockets without being transparent about it. 

Dilution hurts longs and it is the company's duty to be transparent about it not matter how big or little it may be. 

To touch on my example yesterday over the past 30 months CGC has diluted their stock by 250% to fuel growth prospects. 

Their market cap has increased by 1199% over these 30 months, however the share price has only increased by 339%, due to the dilution. 

This is a net difference of 860% ... to date we can say that for every 1% of dilution has cost longs 3.44% return based on today's price, and this will only compound as the price grinds higher in the future.

You guys may think I am nuts going on about small amounts of dilution all the time but see how it compounds and decreases long term value. 

I am sure the battle tested longs that hung in here are happy about 339% over 30 months ... not many investment options out there would yield this kind of return over such a small time frame. 

Over this period of time CGC's management has always disclosed any newly added shares via bought deals, acquisitions or issued options by way of public news release ... me as an investor had the information and could make my investment decisions based on it. 

So Vic's options that he didn't disclose and the greasy timing is a big problem for me, as it makes me wonder what else he has not disclosed to the public, or what may he do in the future. This is poor management, a leader should be open and transparent. 

Call it what you want but I'm glad Bruce released the article he did today. His job is to drive value and protect the long interest of CGC. He is being transparent and as we've come to learn some other managers can't say the same. 

Regards,

Tim 




Bullboard Posts