RE:RE:RE:RE:EddySantanaIf true credit where it's due m'lady, this strawman syntax stickler is starting to sound a lot like twitter's favourite meme generator. Carry on #shortingcanada and #shortingfakenews for profits folks!
Iattice wrote: Someone used that term with me just the other day.
What a small world it is.
Hawaii2010 wrote: Eddy, “Pedantic”, really?
In the words of Inigo Montoya in “The Princess Bride”: “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
Kind of like when you refer to EIF as an airline while ignoring small things like Regional One, Provincial Aerospace’s Maritime patrol contracts & MRO, EIF’s manufacturing companies, etc.
I am mystified by the parallel assertions of you and Cohodes that:
1) EIF is operating an “archaic airline fleet” with a naturally higher cost structure.
And
2) EIF is somehow systematically overcharging its First Nations customers.
Well which is it? If either of these contradictory assertions (ie. It is not overcharging if you actually have a high cost operating structure) were remotely true you would expect to see competitors enter the market and cause the collapse of flight volumes as Cohodes postulated in his initial attempt to smear EIF (remember that he forecast that Perimeter was supposed to see an 80% reduction in flight volumes in June?)
However, none of these short assertions are proving to be true, flight volumes are not collapsing and, in fact, are quite healthy.
We are in August, summer is ending and the Q3 results are looming on the horizon. Time is running out on the shorts.