RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Aphria is having a celebration on their board.DiligentSon...if you go back and read my posts you will see that I was saying there is NO correlation between the two CGS. What management does in one company does not affect CGS in the other comapny. Canopy's CGS has more to do with their own management decsions and nothing to do with Aphria.
DiligentSon wrote: I think you misunderstood. I was legitimately asking, What correlation you are suggesting exists between the 2 CGS...at which point I will try to explain mine further. No offense meant! Sorry, not on this board often so am not familiar with your position on this...
Monteviale wrote: Duediligence.... "Rather contradictory. You see, the original poster is saying there would be little to no affect on others...to which I disagree." Your words not mine....
You were implying that there was a correlationt between what one company does and how it impacts other companies.
I asked you to put apply your statment in context of CGS reported by aphria and canopy.
My question to you was "How does Aphria's CGS impact what Canopy's reported CGS is?" DiligentSon wrote: Not sure I'm following you...what correlation specifically are you referring to?
Monteviale wrote: DiligentSon, fair enough. But there is exception to all rules, otherwise how do you expalin a correlation between what Aphria's CGS reports and what Canopy reports. They are both independent of eachother where management decisions by Aphria has no impact on Canopy's CGS.
On the other hand I can see where management marketing decsions may impact sales of the other company.