RE:RE:Bruce Linton...we talking about "warmup".Squishy, lighten up and read all my posts. If you do you will find out why I'm enthusiastic about Aphria. A bit of humour goes a long way. If it is okay for Bruce to draw the analogy that he doesnt need to win the warm-up, its the game that matters, then I should be allowed to bring up "practice' ...we talking practice.
If you find Aphria shareholders offensive then I dont know how to help you. Never met someone who valued their investment based on likability factor of shareholders.
As for Bruce, he is a big boy. My advice to him is that he shouldn't dish it out if he cant take it.
My only question for you is, Why is Bruce so concerned about Aphria investing in the USA? Nothing stopping him from doing the same. And if you are going to say it is not legal at the Federal level in the USA ,then I suggest that you take the time to read all my posts over the last four weeks.
SquishyInc wrote: One of the reasons (admittedly a less significant one), i was hesitant to take a position here is because so many of you value your investment reflexively, aka using Canopy as the benchmark and reference. Now that i have a respectable stake here, i find that tendency even more disturbing. I admit, i'm disappointed by CGCs' earnings, but i would think if you truly felt confident in APH, you wouldn't need to talk about another company to know the value in what you owned. Am i wrong? Why can't you just say "this is why i'm enthusiastic about APH", and talk about that? Why is it so many CGC investors enjoy talking about which products are available and order numbers, etc? When all you guys seem to talk about is CGC?
Monteviale wrote: Bruce Linton on BNN today talking about not being being profitable during warm-up, He can be, but he is deferring profit for now, because it's the "game that matters" and the game doesn't start for another 6 to 12 months. Couldn't help but think of Iverson back in the day talking about practice.
We talking about practice