Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Aphria Inc. APHA

Aphria, which is headquartered in Ontario, produces and sells medicinal and recreational cannabis. The company operates through retail and wholesale channels in Canada and internationally. Aphria is a main distributor of medical cannabis to Germany and has operations in over 10 countries outside of Canada. However, it does not have exposure to the U.S. CBD or THC markets due to the constraints of federal prohibition. It has some U.S. exposure through the acquisition of SweetWater, a craft brewer


NDAQ:APHA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Montevialeon Aug 18, 2017 2:01am
97 Views
Post# 26594966

RE:RE:RE:Aphrias' (Lack?) of Ethics...

RE:RE:RE:Aphrias' (Lack?) of Ethics...Squishy... thata boy.... 
  1. I feel very good about it.  A government program in place for 51 years and you want me to feel bad?  Seriously...   Please email IR tomorrow and make sure they  take full advantage of what has been a long time program.  Hate to see them miss out on a competitive opportunity.  
  2. "Apparently common practice" as per who?   Aphria ethics vs your ethics...Aphria wins hands down everytime, no questions asked.  Truly, I find it ironic that you are the one bringing up ethics.
  3. You are partially right about the two websites.  If you go to the Aphria website and scroll down to the bottom of the page, you will see a small american flag on the right had side.  Click on it and it'll take you to the USA website.  So yes, a Canadian site and an American site, which is the two sites you are most likely referring to.  You might want to call the TMX to let them know Aphria is doing business in the US.  Oh wait, forget it, they already approved Arizona and Florida.
  4. Your're right, we're starting to see a pattern of behaviour but its not coming from Aphria.   
Glad you appreciate the conversation.  Everyone needs somebody that they can chat with, I'll take one for the board. 

You do realize that your post and my response is a waste of everyone's time on here.  If you are going to criticise Aphria's management, which is fair game, you should really put some thought into it before posting.   Com'on, give it another shot.

M

SquishyInc wrote: Great, now we're talking Montie! 
1. Regarding Aphrias' use of migrant workers, you say it's moot, aka up for discussion or debate. Does this mean you don't know if they do? Does anybody know if Aphria uses migrant workers? If not, i'll email IR tomorrow so we can have some clarity. But you're not saying Aphria doesn't use migrant workers, right? But if they do, as a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada, and therefore as an educated citizen ostensibly committed to social (and economic) justice, how do you feel about that?  

2. It's apparently common practice for a reputable company listed on a major exchange to notify it's shareholders of any dilution whatsoever, am i wrong? As a sharelholder, shouldn't we at least be shown that much respect? Whether it's law or not isn't the point, imo. My post was about Aphrias' ethics. Don't you, as a shareholder, feel that you should be notified that you now own less of the company than you did before? And what about the timing? Thoughts?

3. It sounds to me like Aphria had two websites, one for veterans, with veteran pricing, and one for the general public. It seems to have gotten swept under the carpet, but i gotta say, it's a factor in my overall perspective on this organization, and i can't help but but take it into consideration. 

Really great discussion so far Montie, i really appreciate it!




Monteviale wrote: Squishy,  let me try and answer the three questions for you..
  1. Mexican migrant workers....moot question because you yourself stated that you don't know if Aphria hires mexican workers.  
  2. Does anyone care about Aphria's options - I'm sure they followed the rules, but if what you say is true, I'm still not concerned.  
  3. Veterans Affair - old news, but seeing you brought it up - veteran affairs paid out $44.5 million for medical marijuana expenses in year before the giovernment cracked down on soaring reimbursement costs - Can you please remind us how much of that was paid to Aphria?  Can you cite any credible source provding details of the investigation you are alluding to?  Has Health Canada or Veteran Affairs taken any action against Aphria?  NO, NO and NO.  
Anything else you like to discuss?


SquishyInc wrote:

I’m sure none of us is real sure about what’s going to happen with the whole TMX/CDS situation brought about by Aphrias’ risky American play. The fact is, Aphria at any point in time could be forced to divest its’ interest in the US or face delisting. They’ve put a boilerplate clause in their annual report explaining the clear risks, including prosecution by individuals or groups, damage to reputation and ability to do business generally, risk to listings on stock exchanges etc. More importantly, does it seem shady to anybody that APH didn’t tell any of its’ shareholders that they were going to pursue a market that may significantly endanger their investment? Or that they were going to use your investment money to to speculate on other companies, some of which were decidedly failures? All this has gotten me thinking about Aphrias’ approach from an ethical perspective. I thought maybe it was worth talking about. Here are some important questions, imo...

 

Does Aphria use Mexican migrant workers?

 

I really don’t know the answer here, but i’m hoping somebody here might know. If that’s the case, how do you all feel about that? Wouldn’t that mean that Aphrias’ record string of (pretty pathetic, let's be honest with eachother here)  profits are literally made on the backs of migrants? I won't pretend to understand all the nuances of that whole debate, but it doesn't sit well. What will happen if Aphria ever has to start paying its’ people living wages? Looking for some clarity here, for sure.  Which leads me to point 2…

 

Does anybody care about Aphrias’ most recent issuing of options? 

 

Many eyebrows were raised by the lack of notification and the timing, here’s a post shining some light on the whole issue, from another board: 

 

“Show me one other TSX listed company that issued compensatory stock options to employees with issueing a NR.  Further show me one other company that had the nerve to issue said options a day after their stock spiked and backdated them to what should have been their quiet period.  Blackout or quiet periods are there for exactly this reason, as the company has information readily in their hands that the market doesn't.  This was imo one of the shadiest deals I have seen in my career.  Absolutely disgusting.”

 

Thirdly, most will remember the scandal that came to light showing how Aphria had gouged veterans, here’s an article illuminating the details of some seriously shady practice:

 

Aphrias' Veteran Pricing Scandal

 

All just some food for thought for the discerning investor. I'm starting to see a pattern of behaviour in Aphrias approach which could be a red flag. I'm hoping you can convince me otherwise!

 

Discuss! 


 




Bullboard Posts