RE:RE:CDS Policy - Bruce Linton's red herring Grnhouse, glad to see we agree on some issues. I think Bruce's frustration on BNN is more an industry wide issue and not just a Canopy issue.
I'm sure all LPs would like to see big US funds investing in Canadian LPs. Ironically, Bruce and Vic are on the same side when it comes to attracting big US funds.
No matter what Canadian LPs do to attract big US investment funds, I dont see it happening until marijuana is removed as a schedule 1 drug in the US.
I agree with your point about less volatility, but higher share price (less dillution) favours all shareholders, especially if capital has to be raised.
M
Grnhousegarbage wrote:
I agree with most of what you're saying for once. The only thing I don't agree on is stronger quarters supporting a stabler share price. Strong quarter's would send the sp up higher which is what investors want but the point of having more shares locked up by funds is to have less shares on the open market for traders and retail investor to buy and sell on a whim. Less shares in weak hand or hands of traders equals less volatility and a more stable share price. A few good quarters just means more swings, swings trending upward, but still swings not less volatility.