RE:STEAL ??You are correct in your view about the lack of institutional investment due to the listings on the CSE, however your concern about
"Tinley has done a dreadful job of marketing/promotion" has been addressed frequently by shared correspondence from Management. They have acknowledged that at the present the cart is in front of the horse.
There would be nothing worse for a new product being marketed than to have an insufficient supply of product available for purchase. When the production issues have been finalized we have been promised a very aggressive marketing campaign.
nicebigfish wrote: With all due respect, I will disagree with your assessment below. Institutional investors will rarely if ever invest with any substance companies trading on the CSE. Secondly, IMHO, Tinley has done a dreadful job of marketing/promotion. This MUST improve. There is a mere 4 months left until the lid is lifted on the California market. Certainly hope our boys get the PR machine rolling with timely systematic news during this span. It is a MUST!!!!!!!!