RE:RE:RE:where do you see great results !!!
@goldpirate99 -- I, too, wonder if the existing lithium in the soil is sufficient for profit. Extraction efforts are greatly reduced with establilshed infrastucture. Whether or not the lithium was a bang or bust, how much % is actually reduced from operating costs because of the infrastucture? Would the final numbers stack up against more successful lithium mining operations? At first I was in it for the short, but I don't see this playing out any time soon. With so little news releases it's difficult for $ION.V to get some traction. The business aspect is there. It's all feasible and will make money. It just might not be the jackpot that everyone was hoping for (which is rare to begin with). Funding to take advantage of what they have now while continuing to move forward in looking for the jackpot will come from us, the investors, who see sustainable opportunity. Not a lottery. ---@Weeble: I'm not a geologist so I don't know at what scale it would take to turn a profit. I also don't put my trust in an article from a website that doesn't even show up on the first page when you type it's name out; not to mention an article from somebody who I can't verify experience, credentials, or anybody who vouches for him. There's also nothing wrong in taking advantage of an opportunity while still performing research on your main objective for feasibility. It would have been stupid otherwise from a business standpoint: ignore the opportunity of potassium altogether. The lithium jackpot is still being sought after and ION.v is taking advantage of what they can while they get there. When life gives you lemons you make lemonade, not throw them out. The CEO doesn't seem like he's attacking "naysayers", but rather defending his company and his character from accusations and personal attacks. Additionally, nothing has been proven right from IKN or DanO. DanO's article makes personal attacks throughout - in terribly bad taste when it comes to journaling. He mentions "Barry" 28 times throughout the article. If that doesn't sound personal then I don't know what is anymore. The author cites comparisons like a glass of champagne vs. an olympic swimming pool. Based on simple math from the numbers the author referenced, this is an extreme over-exaggeration. How would an experienced and credible team over-look a multi-million dollar obvious detail like the size of their salars? It's like having a family of 7 and going out to buy a sedan instead of a mini-van knowing that there's no refunds. Totally defaming article written in bad taste from an author I can't seem to find anything about. I performed research on the executive team at ION.v and I purchased shares after I felt comfortable with who Alset was being led by. Smart leaders don't go into business blind looking for a quick buck. It's not sustainable and would ruin the reputation of all involved (for a quick buck?). It's not worth it for anybody. This may not be the jackpot lottery, but there's still money to be made in the current circumstances. ----- I read an article yesterday on Bloomberg titled "Supplying Lithium for the Electric Revolution Is Getting Harder". ION.v, among many others, are in the same boat. The difference between ION.v and others is that ION.v has other opportunities for revenue.--- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-21/supplying-lithium-gets-trickier-as-electric-revolution-quickens