RE:Fourth Patient was treated with full dose on July 20th Hi SizzlinSteaks;
I like to think things all the way through, including taking a realistic hard look at the downside possibilities. I believe that Theralase would be taking a totally unnecessary and very serious risk to issue one PR for each patient. It is much safer stance to issue one bulk PR after all six high dose people have had their C-T scans done.
Here's why. Say for example, we treated all six people in rapid succession and had an overall 4 out of 6 success rate, but the first two people were fails. How hard would the company be hit if the first two patients in a row were PR'd as fails? The news would devastate the share price and demoralize the longs. We would find it impossible to raise capital at that point, putting the whole company at risk of continuation. The shorts would have a field day. How many people would then abandon their winning investment because they never held on to see that the next four people in a row did very well?
How about issuing one positive PR stating that 4 of 6 patients did very well, 2/3's, a 67% success rate. We are the champions, bask in the glory and riches of our success, and we survive to continue on to many more great things.
Now, how do you want to see Theralase handle patient PR's?
Thanks;
made2last