Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Aphria Inc. APHA

Aphria, which is headquartered in Ontario, produces and sells medicinal and recreational cannabis. The company operates through retail and wholesale channels in Canada and internationally. Aphria is a main distributor of medical cannabis to Germany and has operations in over 10 countries outside of Canada. However, it does not have exposure to the U.S. CBD or THC markets due to the constraints of federal prohibition. It has some U.S. exposure through the acquisition of SweetWater, a craft brewer


NDAQ:APHA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by SquishyIncon Aug 30, 2017 7:07pm
139 Views
Post# 26639764

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:How much capital is needed for Pharmacy and Rec sales float?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:How much capital is needed for Pharmacy and Rec sales float?Lo siento mucho! I was just agreeing with Montie that everything you say should be taken for granted without due consideration or critical thought. As per his thesis regarding Canopys' concern about the terrifying hijacking of mail order, it did occur to me that APH will benefit and rely upon that eventuality as much or more, but then i realized he knows better, as do you.
GoBlue2016 wrote: GreasyInc

do you think you can tip us off when you are outright making sh!t up in your posts. 

It would be helpful. 

Lieing sack. Criticizing others credibility and ethics. You are a piece of work.  Elmer level cr@p. 

Do you ever have any original info for the boards?  Or are you like Waldorf and Stadtler from the Muppet Show.  You certainly seem to be the definition of  Muppet Bait. 

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/muppet-bait.asp

GoBlue

SquishyInc wrote: Yes, Goblue absolutely must be taken seriously. And ya, obviously Adam Greenblatt is really worried. Great work, as usual, Montie.
Monteviale wrote: GoBlue has to be taken seriously when he mentioned in earlier posts that direct mail would be hijacked by Provinces.   If yesterday's post by GoBlue didn't convince you that provinces may hijack the direct mail order system then recent comments by Adam Greenblatt, Quebec brand manager for Canopy Growth should.  

Greenblatt stated that allowing direct online sales to anyone in Quebec "is a touchy issue" in the province.   He said the province's health authorities have raised concerns about mail order marijuana once it becomes legal.  

Greenblatt, whose company plans to rely heavily on direct online mail order business once rec marijuana becomes legal said "its all the more important to allow us to continue doing this because there is already a black market mail-order business."  

Greenblatt, if nothing else, is worried that Quebec has already raised concerns about leaving mail-order marijuana in the hands of LP's. 

For full story click on following link:

Provinces agree legal pot must be competitive with black market, Bill Blair says

M

GoBlue2016 wrote: Well look at this....

Did I not mention in the OP that direct mail would be hijacked by Provinces. 

 

Financial Post

 

Gordon H. Fox: To eliminate illicit cannabis market, we need e-commerce 

 

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/gordon-h-fox

 

Fox is CEO of Emblem

 

"Since many provinces may not have retail locations ready for July 1, 2018, Ottawa is contemplating a temporary e-commerce delivery system, through which Canadians will be able to order lawful cannabis from licensed producers over the Internet (just like they can with many other consumer products)... However, comments by various government representatives suggest the government intends to put an end to this e-commerce model once provincial retail stores are in place."

 

"The federal government is the only level of government with the constitutional authority to govern the e-commerce delivery of adult cannabis, as the undertaking involves a regulated substance, inter-provincial trade and commerce, and mail: all federal areas of responsibility under the Constitution Act, 1867. In making provision for a permanent e-commerce model, though, the new Cannabis Act should still allow for retail distribution. Consumers should simply be able to choose between purchasing cannabis in stores or online. The provinces and cities could maintain responsibility for the retail sale of cannabis “at the street level,” since these local undertakings are quite properly within their purview."

 

I can see the Provincial Finance Ministers wrapping their fingers around Direct Mail through provincial web portals. 

 

Those JUICY direct mail margins will be transferred to the provinces.  

Nice to be low cost, eh?

GoBlue

 

 


GoBlue2016 wrote:

How much extra capital will LP's need to raise to float payment terms for Rec and Pharmacy?

 

As we approach day 1 of rec we also approach non cash payment terms for sales. 

 

LCBO isn't paying cash at delivery like current patients do. The provinces will be getting approximately 90 days from receipt of goods or invoice from LP's to pay for their mj. Private rec models for distribution  certainly won't get 90 days to pay like a province owned would. Many dispensaries might be on cash terms. 

 

You may think, my LP doesn't have to worry about this as they will have Direct Mail and get paid quickly. However, what if Provinces with self owned distribution set up dual delivery: retail store front and their own direct mail program. If they go down this road, I would imagine  for direct mail they would either 1) centrally warehouse inventory and ship provincially from the central location, or 2) set up a web portal with province as the face and LP's fulfilling shipments a la Amazon. The latter would likely be the most efficient. In the first option the LP would have to wait for payment. In the second maybe not, but they would have to send the province the province's cut of sales. 

 

The provinces are incentivized to eat into LP's direct mail as much as possible,  as it redistributes revenue to their province from that of the LP. More money and taxes for the provinces. So either excise tax or competing direct mail or both. 

 

LP's with direct mail may be in the unenviable position of competing with their biggest customers. Customers that can limit LP shelf space in retail outlets if LPs don't play ball with them on direct mail. Or slap excise taxes that LPs will have to collect and remit (just like wineries). 

 

For provinces that will own their distribution channels let's say 90 days for payment terms. The longer the payment terms the less taxpayer money is needed to set up retail distribution. 

 

Pharmacy also comes with payment terms.  National Pharmacy Chain terms are 120 days from invoice. 

 

So LP's dealing with National Pharmacy are looking to have to float 120 days of sales in the form of A/R. This is in addition to minimum levels of inventory requirements on LP floors, as is required in most chain pharmacy contracts. So let's call it a month of inventory on hand and 120 days payment terms, for a total of 150 days of inventory and A/R combined. 

 

In most businesses the banks would step up and lend 75-85% of the Accounts Receivable and 50% of Finished Goods inventory (that is what is called a "margined" or "borrowing base" operating line). But the banks are not likely to be there at Day 1. Credit Unions could provide the "margined" operating line, but CU's tend to avail pretty small dollar limits. 

 

I reached out to a buddy who runs the commercial lending department of a local CU and asked him what a notional upper limit a CU would have on a "margined" O/L. He told me a Big CU could go $25 million but not margined. The O/L would have to backed by tangible security like multipurpose and saleable real estate. 

 

So banks and CU's are not likely a solution, which leaves equity raises.  

 

So if an LP expects to sell $10 million a month in rec they'll need $30 million in float to cover A/R. $20 million a month in sales is a $60 million float for A/R. 

 

An LP that expects $10 million a month in National Pharmacy will need $50 million in float to cover A/R. $20 a month is a $100 million float for A/R. 

 

We have been focussed on being fully funded for expansion. But does your LP have funding for the inevitable payment terms??

 

GoBlue. 

 

Aphria longs: no worries Carl raised Pharmacy float in April/May raise.  

 

 

 






Bullboard Posts