RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SquishyInc has been and will always be irrelevantChances...great post.
See, one can learn more by posting on boards that don't align with ones own beliefs. No need for me to post an opinion on a board where my post will be positively supported becuase of the board it is posted on.
When i read Gordon Fox's opinion yesterday, along with Adam Greenblatt's comments combined with the fact that most provinces want to maximize the money they receive from regualting cannabis, its reasonable to expect that the provinces will hijack mail order business. It seems to be going that way. Which makes lowest cost producer even more important.
Canopy, has invested the most time and resources in setting up theri mail order business, therefore it stands to reason they have the most to lose. Therefore they would have the most interesting opinions on the issue.
Your opinion helps address the issue.
M
ChacenAces wrote: With all due respect Monteviale you are putting a lot of words in Greenblat's mouth that simply were not there. I dont see how he is taking your position at all. Its a fair discussion but then you need to own the opinion because nothing in the article whatsoever implies that Greenblat "took the position you have". You simply see what you wanted to see not necesarily what is actually there.
Mail order rec wasnt even on the table for most investors or LPs until the task force reccomended it. Lets say for the sake of discussion ypu are right...who cares. Its just a website...take it down and the buyers will still buy whats available wherever it is available. Again its about production, scale up and actual harvest by the begining of 2018. There are very clear and obvious leaders (LPs) who will qualify in this regard and at this time regardless of each individual LPs plans for future square footage its a simple fact that no other LP at this time has gone through the learning curve and scale up Canopy has...not even close. If every LP scales up at the same rate from this minute onward Canopy will always be miles ahead...for this to change Canopy would have to decide to stop right now and that is simply not going to be the case.
What i find interesting is that you choose to have this discussion on this board which while i have no particular issue with it seems your fellow APH shareholders could get more benifit from you discussing the pros and cons of mail order on the APH board rather than here. I would suggest the question you should pose on the APH board should be wether your fellow shareholders in APH feel Vic should or should not have created a simmilar online platform with Craftgrow & the Rivers angle.
Most that post here are shareholders already & feel it was the right move for Canopy...THATS WHY WE ARE STILL SHAREHOLDERS AND POST ON THIS BOARD. Personally if i didnt feel it was the right move I would cease to be a shareholder and would no longer post on any WEED board because i would no longer hold any position and have better things to do with my time.
Monteviale wrote: Greenme, call it what you want. I'm not even trying to be passive. If it makes you feel better I agree with the thesis that the provinces will try and hijack mail order business.
Your brand manager in Quebec seems to be saying the same thing, either that or he believes the province will try and cut it out all together. Therefore your brand manager is taking the position i have. Does this mean he too is bashing CGC?
Try and address the issue I raised. If you have nothing to contribute, that fine, just tell us that.
M
GreenNme wrote: "Fires shots" in the most passive aggressive of ways. I believe they call it soft bashing.
Grnhousegarbage wrote:
ya but we all know your intentions are not to have an honest discussion. You fire shots at canopy when ever you get the chance. So please, don't pretend you're trying to do anything but raise concern!