RE:Windgod46 or Bond46 you have no credibility at all Check the number of readers dude. 250 in all. let us see yours.
The term was used first by Freud to explain the conflict between the sexes. Today we can use the term to describe the envy of the market "analysts" vis-a-vis science. It seems these analysts are sweating it out trying to outdo and out pace the scientists proper in their attempts to predict the future. Science proper is called that because it can make predictions based on scientific laws and theories. But the market "analysts"? Can they make predictions about the market and stocks? They think they can. They can also be "scientists" and escape the disgrace of being called quacks or what have you, withcrafters, charlatans, or even pseudo-prophets. To avoid all that, because it's bad for business, they wrap themselves in the cloak of science and so they make predictions about stocks and the market in order to change them before the sunset. This is the state of the dismal science called "market" theory. Yet these people comand the respect of the naive and the desperadoes in the market. Time to see these people exactly for what they are, just charlatans, to put mildly. And the same holds true for the so called TA with the rule and pencil instruments of "science".
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=t.crh&postid=26647075#dJBGvQORscM7jTUV.99