GREY:PGDIF - Post by User
Comment by
ekimon Sep 21, 2017 4:01pm
114 Views
Post# 26727681
RE:RE:RE:RE:PGD Drill NR Sept 21st 2017
RE:RE:RE:RE:PGD Drill NR Sept 21st 2017Without loading up the interscections and holes in some 3D program.
We have DD39,44,45,46 that clearly look to go to the regions that you talk about.
The news release say 2 of the holes ended in kimberlite below 530...so they don't have pierce points at that depth. The other 2 probably were drilled with the incoming pierce point and exiting piere point in mind...so there is none..is probably just plain wrong.
But...we don't have all the data..there is a lack of information in the minute details.
Mineral services in conjunction with PGD will probably be doing the work and they...not me or you...will decide how comfortable they are with inferred shapes at depth.
Inferring is not a straight horizontal world. Inference from the above will also be used.
LONG...PGD
EKIM